|
A syllogism ( ''syllogismos'', "conclusion, inference") is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true. In its earliest form, defined by Aristotle, from the combination of a general statement (the major premise) and a specific statement (the minor premise), a conclusion is deduced. For example, knowing that all men are mortal (major premise) and that Socrates is a man (minor premise), we may validly conclude that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic arguments are usually represented in a three-line form (without sentence-terminating periods): All men are mortal ==Early history== In antiquity, two rival theories of the syllogism existed: Aristotelian syllogistic and Stoic syllogistic.〔Michael Frede, "Stoic vs. Peripatetic Syllogistic", Archive for the History of Philosophy 56, 1975, 99-124.〕 Aristotle defines the syllogism as, "...a discourse in which certain (specific) things having been supposed, something different from the things supposed results of necessity because these things are so."〔Aristotle, "Prior Analytics", 24b18–20〕 Despite this very general definition, in Aristotle's work ''Prior Analytics'', he limits himself to categorical syllogisms that consist of three categorical propositions.〔(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ''Ancient Logic'': Aristotle: Non-Modal Syllogistic )〕 These include categorical modal syllogisms.〔(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ''Ancient Logic'': Aristotle: Modal Logic )〕 From the Middle Ages onwards, ''categorical syllogism'' and ''syllogism'' were usually used interchangeably. This article is concerned only with this traditional use. The syllogism was at the core of traditional deductive reasoning, where facts are determined by combining existing statements, in contrast to inductive reasoning where facts are determined by repeated observations. Within academic contexts, the syllogism was superseded by first-order predicate logic following the work of Gottlob Frege, in particular his ''Begriffsschrift'' (''Concept Script'') (1879), but syllogisms remain useful in some circumstances, and for general-audience introductions to logic.〔Hurley, Patrick J (2011). ''A Concise Introduction to Logic'', Cengage Learning, ISBN 9780840034175〕〔Zegarelli, Mark (2010). ''Logic for Dummies'', John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9781118053072〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Syllogism」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|